<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jobs 2015.</title>
	<link>http://2cworth.com/2006/04/09/jobs-2015/</link>
	<description>Building my Internet Worth</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Paul</title>
		<link>http://2cworth.com/2006/04/09/jobs-2015/#comment-131</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://2cworth.com/2006/04/09/jobs-2015/#comment-131</guid>
					<description>Seems to me like this would rather be a boom for generations X and Y. He dismisses them as &quot;too young and inexperienced&quot; but I beg to differ. Regardless of which, he is assuming that large numbers of boomers will (a) want to stay in the work force and (b) will survive or be healthy enough long enough to continue to make contributions. Considering how the boomers reacted to turning 40, I am certain that retirement will also be very complex. Nevertheless, there are a large number of boomers who's retirement savings is not likely to let them retire...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me like this would rather be a boom for generations X and Y. He dismisses them as &#8220;too young and inexperienced&#8221; but I beg to differ. Regardless of which, he is assuming that large numbers of boomers will (a) want to stay in the work force and (b) will survive or be healthy enough long enough to continue to make contributions. Considering how the boomers reacted to turning 40, I am certain that retirement will also be very complex. Nevertheless, there are a large number of boomers who&#8217;s retirement savings is not likely to let them retire&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
